Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Shame, stigma, HIV: philosophical reflections
  1. Phil Hutchinson1,
  2. Rageshri Dhairyawan2
  1. 1 Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
  2. 2 Department of Integrated Sexual Health, Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Redbridge University Hospital Trust, Outpatients East, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Phil Hutchinson, Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK; p.hutchinson{at}mmu.ac.uk

Abstract

It is a distinctive feature of HIV that its pathology cannot be adequately grasped separate from a number of psychosocial factors, and stigma is widely seen as the most prominent. We argue that it is equally important to have an adequate understanding of shame, as the emotional response to stigma. We have identified five ways shame might negatively impact upon attempts to combat and treat HIV, which emerge from the stigma HIV carries and STI-stigma in general. In this paper, we draw out four insights from philosophical work on emotions and shame which we propose will improve understanding of shame and stigma. We conclude by briefly discussing how these insights might shed light on the negative role shame can play for a person living with HIV engaging with, or being retained in, care. We conclude by proposing further study.

  • Shame
  • Stigma
  • HIV
  • Philosophy

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.