Abstract
Research on text processing has generally focused on the types of inferences that all readers draw in common. Our research examines aspects of processing that depend on the particular relation of the reader to the text. Students read fictional stories that contained weak and unsupported assertions and that were set either at their own school or at another school. We expected that they would be prompted to process the story information thoroughly enough to reject the assertions only if they were familiar with the story setting. Consistent with this expectation, the results showed that the away-school story, but not the home-school story, had a significant impact on students’ beliefs. These results support the view that readers must actively construct disbelief when processing fictional information.
Article PDF
References
Allbritton, D. W., &Gerrig, R. J. (1991). Participatory responses in prose understanding.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 603–626.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, R. (1988).The lyre of Orpheus. New York: Penguin.
Eagly, A. H., &Chaiken, S. (1993).The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993).Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gerrig, R. J., &Prentice, D. A. (1991). The representation of fictional information.Psychological Science,2, 336–340.
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe.American Psychologist,46, 107–119.
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., &Malone, P. S. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,59, 601–613.
Graesser, A., Singer, M., &Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.Psychological Review,101, 371–395.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading.Psychological Review,99, 440–466.
Petty, R. E., &Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,46, 69–81.
Petty, R. E., &Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). San Diego: Academic Press.
Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., &Brock, T. C. (Eds.) (1981).Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Restak, R. M. (1988).The mind. New York: Bantam.
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,42, 798–810.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prentice, D.A., Gerrig, R.J. & Bailis, D.S. What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, 416–420 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210803
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210803