Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study

Abstract

Here we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate stages of processing in face perception in humans. We found a face-selective MEG response occurring only 100 ms after stimulus onset (the 'M100'), 70 ms earlier than previously reported. Further, the amplitude of this M100 response was correlated with successful categorization of stimuli as faces, but not with successful recognition of individual faces, whereas the previously-described face-selective 'M170' response was correlated with both processes. These data suggest that face processing proceeds through two stages: an initial stage of face categorization, and a later stage at which the identity of the individual face is extracted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: MEG data from a typical subject.
Figure 2: Amplitudes of the peak M100 response, averaged across subjects, to faces and a variety of nonface objects at predefined sensors of interest.
Figure 3: Stimulus and task for experiment 4.
Figure 4: Categorization versus identification.
Figure 5: Face configuration versus face parts.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M. & Boyes-Braem, P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognit. Psychol. 8, 382–349 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M.A. & Kosslyn, S.M. Pictures and names: making the connection. Cognit. Psychol. 16, 243–275 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugase, Y., Yamane, S., Ueno, S. & Kawano, K. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature 400, 869–873 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka, J.W. & Taylor, M. Object categories and expertise: is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognit. Psychol. 23, 457–482 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka, J.W. The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 534–543 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grill-Spector, K. & Kanwisher, N. Common cortical mechanisms for different components of visual object recognition: a combined behavioral and fMRI study. J. Vision 1, 474a (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E. & McCarthy, G. Electrophysiological studies of face perceptions in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 551–565 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffreys, D.A. Evoked potential studies of face and object processing. Vis. Cogn. 3, 1–38 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sams, M., Hietanen, J.K., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R.J. & Lounasmaa, O.V. Face-specific responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroscience 77, 49–55 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, J., Higuchi, M., Marantz, A. & Kanwisher, N. The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces. Neuroreport 11, 337–341 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce, V. & Young, A. Understanding face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 77 (Pt 3), 305–327 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eimer, M. The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport 11, 2319–2324 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seeck, M. et al. Evidence for rapid face recognition from human scalp and intracranial electrodes. Neuroreport 8, 2749–2754 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schendan, H.E., Ganis, G. & Kutas, M. Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology 35, 240–251 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M.H., Bentin, S., Aguera, P.E. & Pernier, J. Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 303–310 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawasaki, H. et al. Single-neuron responses to emotional visual stimuli recorded in human ventral prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 15–16 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Braeutigam, S., Bailey, A.J. & Swithenby, S.J. Task-dependent early latency (30–60 ms) visual processing of human faces and other objects. Neuroreport 12, 1531–1536 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Streit, M., Wolwer, W., Brinkmeyer, J., Ihl, R. & Gaebel, W. Electrophysiological correlates of emotional and structural face processing in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 278, 13–16 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. George, N., Jemel, B., Fiori, N. & Renault, B. Face and shape repetition effects in humans: a spatiotemporal ERP study. Neuroreport 8, 1417–1423 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. VanRullen, R. & Thorpe, S.J. The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 454–461 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Allison, T., Puce, A., Spencer, D.D. & McCarthy, G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb. Cortex 9, 415–430 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tootell, R.B., Mendola, J.D., Hadjikhani, N.K., Liu, A.K. & Dale, A.M. The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 818–824 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sadr, J. & Sinha, P. Exploring object perception with Random Image Structure Evolution. MIT Artif. Int. Lab. Memo, 2001–6 (2001).

  24. Sadr. J. & Sinha, P. Object recognition and random image structure evolution. Cognit. Sci. (in press).

  25. Watson, A.B. & Pelli, D.G. Quest: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept. Psychophys. 33, 113–120 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thorpe, S., Fize, D. & Marlot, C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381, 520–522 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Knuutila, J. & Lounasmaa, O.V. Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 413–497 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bentin, S. in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (ed. Nadel, L.) Neural basis of face perception. (Macmillan, London, in press).

  29. Oram, M.W. & Perrett, D.I. Time course of neural responses discriminating different views of the face and head. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 70–84 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rolls, E.T. Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Hum. Neurobiol. 3, 209–222 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thorpe, S.J. & Fabre-Thorpe, M. Seeking categories in the brain. Science 291, 260–263 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gomez Gonzalez, C.M., Clark, V.P., Fan, S., Luck, S.J. & Hillyard, S.A. Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topogr. 7, 41–51 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thorpe, S. & Imbert, M. Connectionism in Perspective (eds. Pfeifer, R., Schreter, Z., Fogelman-Soulie, F. & Steels, L.) 63–92 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kovacs, G., Vogels, R. & Orban, G.A. Cortical correlate of pattern backward masking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5587–5591 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Keysers, C., Xiao, D.K., Foldiak, P. & Perrett, D.I. The speed of sight. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 90–101 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Farah, M.J. Visual Cognition (eds. Kosslyn, S. M. & Osherson, D. N.) 101–119 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rainer, G., Augath, M., Trinath, T. & Logothetis, N.K. Nonmonotonic noise tuning of BOLD fMRI signal to natural images in the visual cortex of the anesthetized monkey. Curr. Biol. 11, 846–854 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Sadr and P. Sinha for helpful discussions on their RISE technique, M. Eimer, S. Hillyard, A. Marantz, M. Valdes-Sosa, P. Downing, W. Freiwald, K. Grill-Spector, Y. Jiang and the rest of the Kanwisher Lab for comments on the manuscript. Supported by the Reed Fund and National Eye Institute grant (EY13455) to N.K.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Harris, A. & Kanwisher, N. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study. Nat Neurosci 5, 910–916 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn909

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn909

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing