Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Science and Society
  • Published:

Molecular metaphors: the gene in popular discourse

Abstract

Geneticists deploy a striking range of metaphors to communicate their science, to promote its value and to suggest its social meaning to the public. So too, critics of science and special interest groups use metaphorical constructs to express their concerns about the implications of the 'genetic revolution'. Through metaphors, genetics can seem a source of salvation or a means of exploitation, a boon to health or a source of risk. This paper is a critical review of the metaphors used to communicate genetic information to the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Fitter family contests.
Figure 2

References

  1. Angier, N. A pearl and a hodgepodge: human DNA. New York Times A21 (June 27, 2000).

  2. Wallace, B. in The Search for the Gene 199 (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Condit, C. The Meaning of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity (Wisconsin Univ. Press, Madison, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Dijck, J. Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics (New York Univ. Press, New York, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelkin, D. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology 2nd edn (W. H. Freeman, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kevles, D. In the Name of Eugenics (Knopf, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Altimore, M. The social construction of a scientific controversy. Sci. Technol. Human Values 7, 24–31 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hedgecoe, A. Transforming genes: metaphors of information in modern genetics. Science as Culture 8, 209–228 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kay, L. The Molecular Vision of Life (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, J. The performance of a lifetime: a metaphor for the phenotype. Perspect. Biol. Med. 43, 112–127 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ridley, M. Genome (Fourth Estate, London, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nelkin, D. & Lindee, M. S. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as Cultural Icon (W. H. Freeman, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rafter, N. H. Creating Born Criminals (Illinois Univ. Press, Chicago, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Franklin, D. What a child is given. New York Times Magazine 36 (September 3, 1969).

  15. Gilbert, W. Current state of the HGI. Harvard Univ. Dibner Center Lecture (June 15, 1990).

  16. Wade, N. The four letter alphabet that spells life. New York Times 4 (July 2, 2000).

  17. Annas, G. Protecting future diaries. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 270, 234 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henderson, G. Is DNA God? The Pharos 2–6 (Winter, 1988).

  19. Collins, F. White House remarks on decoding of genome. New York Times F8 (June 27, 2000).

  20. Avise, J. The Genetic Gods (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leary, W. Scientists seek Lincoln DNA to clone for a medical study. New York Times 1 (February 10, 1991).

  22. Kary Mullis interview. Omni 69–92 (April, 1992).

  23. Jaroff, L. The gene hunt. Time 62–67 (March 20, 1989).

  24. Andrews, L. & Nelkin, D. Body Bazaar: The Market for Human Tissue in the Biotechnology Age (Crown Publishers, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moore, J. Testimony to the Committee on Human Genome Diversity of the National Academy of Sciences, September 16, 1996.

  26. Steinberg, K. (Centers for Disease Control) Comments at National Institutes of Health meeting on “Genetics Research on Human Tissue” January 19, 1996.

  27. Stefansson, K. Interview. Technol. Rev. 55 (April, 2001).

  28. Turney, J. Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics, and Popular Culture (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stone, R. Religious leaders oppose patenting of genes. Science 268, 1126 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sloan, P. in Controlling our Destinies 176 (Notre Dame Univ. Press, Notre Dame, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Myers, G. The double helix as icon. Science as Culture 9, 49–72 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harley, J. B. The New Nature of Maps (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Monmonier, M. in How to Lie with Maps 199 (Chicago Univ. Press, Illinois, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Keller, E. F. in The Century of the Gene 54–55 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lewontin, R. in Biology as Ideology 48 (Harper Perennial, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Related links

Related links

FURTHER INFORMATION

Francis Crick and James Watson

Kary Mullis

The Human Genome Diversity Project

deCODE Genetics

Image archive on the American Eugenics Movement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelkin, D. Molecular metaphors: the gene in popular discourse. Nat Rev Genet 2, 555–559 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35080583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35080583

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing