Abstract
Geneticists deploy a striking range of metaphors to communicate their science, to promote its value and to suggest its social meaning to the public. So too, critics of science and special interest groups use metaphorical constructs to express their concerns about the implications of the 'genetic revolution'. Through metaphors, genetics can seem a source of salvation or a means of exploitation, a boon to health or a source of risk. This paper is a critical review of the metaphors used to communicate genetic information to the public.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Metaphors as models: Towards a typology of metaphor in ancient science
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Open Access 18 August 2021
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Angier, N. A pearl and a hodgepodge: human DNA. New York Times A21 (June 27, 2000).
Wallace, B. in The Search for the Gene 199 (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York, 1992).
Condit, C. The Meaning of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity (Wisconsin Univ. Press, Madison, 1999).
Van Dijck, J. Imagenation: Popular Images of Genetics (New York Univ. Press, New York, 1998).
Nelkin, D. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology 2nd edn (W. H. Freeman, New York, 1994).
Kevles, D. In the Name of Eugenics (Knopf, New York, 1985).
Altimore, M. The social construction of a scientific controversy. Sci. Technol. Human Values 7, 24–31 (1982).
Hedgecoe, A. Transforming genes: metaphors of information in modern genetics. Science as Culture 8, 209–228 (1999).
Kay, L. The Molecular Vision of Life (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1995).
Lewis, J. The performance of a lifetime: a metaphor for the phenotype. Perspect. Biol. Med. 43, 112–127 (1999).
Ridley, M. Genome (Fourth Estate, London, 2000).
Nelkin, D. & Lindee, M. S. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as Cultural Icon (W. H. Freeman, New York, 1995).
Rafter, N. H. Creating Born Criminals (Illinois Univ. Press, Chicago, 1997).
Franklin, D. What a child is given. New York Times Magazine 36 (September 3, 1969).
Gilbert, W. Current state of the HGI. Harvard Univ. Dibner Center Lecture (June 15, 1990).
Wade, N. The four letter alphabet that spells life. New York Times 4 (July 2, 2000).
Annas, G. Protecting future diaries. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 270, 234 (1993).
Henderson, G. Is DNA God? The Pharos 2–6 (Winter, 1988).
Collins, F. White House remarks on decoding of genome. New York Times F8 (June 27, 2000).
Avise, J. The Genetic Gods (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998).
Leary, W. Scientists seek Lincoln DNA to clone for a medical study. New York Times 1 (February 10, 1991).
Kary Mullis interview. Omni 69–92 (April, 1992).
Jaroff, L. The gene hunt. Time 62–67 (March 20, 1989).
Andrews, L. & Nelkin, D. Body Bazaar: The Market for Human Tissue in the Biotechnology Age (Crown Publishers, New York, 2001).
Moore, J. Testimony to the Committee on Human Genome Diversity of the National Academy of Sciences, September 16, 1996.
Steinberg, K. (Centers for Disease Control) Comments at National Institutes of Health meeting on “Genetics Research on Human Tissue” January 19, 1996.
Stefansson, K. Interview. Technol. Rev. 55 (April, 2001).
Turney, J. Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics, and Popular Culture (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1998).
Stone, R. Religious leaders oppose patenting of genes. Science 268, 1126 (1995).
Sloan, P. in Controlling our Destinies 176 (Notre Dame Univ. Press, Notre Dame, 2001).
Myers, G. The double helix as icon. Science as Culture 9, 49–72 (1990).
Harley, J. B. The New Nature of Maps (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 2001).
Monmonier, M. in How to Lie with Maps 199 (Chicago Univ. Press, Illinois, 1991).
Keller, E. F. in The Century of the Gene 54–55 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000).
Lewontin, R. in Biology as Ideology 48 (Harper Perennial, New York, 1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Related links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelkin, D. Molecular metaphors: the gene in popular discourse. Nat Rev Genet 2, 555–559 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35080583
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35080583
This article is cited by
-
Metaphors as models: Towards a typology of metaphor in ancient science
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences (2021)
-
A metaphor too far
Nature (2011)
-
Why Machine-Information Metaphors are Bad for Science and Science Education
Science & Education (2011)