Skip to main content
Log in

Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students' Learning from Text

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research conducted primarily during the 1970s and 1980s supported the assertion that carefully constructed text illustrations generally enhance learners' performance on a variety of text-dependent cognitive outcomes. Research conducted throughout the 1990s still strongly supports that assertion. The more recent research has extended pictures-in-text conclusions to alternative media and technological formats and has begun to explore more systematically the “whys,” “whens,” and “for whoms” of picture facilitation, in addition to the “whethers” and “how muchs.” Consideration is given here to both more and less conventional types of textbook illustration, with several “tenets for teachers” provided in relation to each type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adler, C. (1993). Directed picture processing: The effects for learners on recall of related text. Diss. Abstr. Int. 54(3-A): 863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. K., Levin, J. R., Beitzel, B. D., and Glover, T. A. (1999). In search of the unique cognitive benefits of mnemonic matrices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April 1999.

  • Atkinson, R. K., Levin, J. R., Kiewra, K. A., Meyers, T., Kim, S., Atkinson, L. A., Renandya, W. A., and Hwang, Y. (1999). Matrix and mnemonic text-processing adjuncts: Comparing and combining their components. J. Educ. Psychol. 91: 342–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balluerka, N. (1995). The influence of instructions, outlines, and illustrations on the comprehension and recall of scientific texts. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 20: 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. J. (1995). Problems in picturing text. Diss. Abstr. Int. Sec. A: Humanities Soc. Sci. 55(11-A): 3357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R. M. (1990). Using extended captions to improve learning from instructional illustrations. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 21: 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betrancourt, M., and Bisseret, A. (1998). Integrating textual and pictorial information via popup windows: An experimental study. Behav. Inf. Technol. 17: 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blystone, R., and Dettling, B. (1990). Visual literacy in science textbooks. In Rowe, M. B. (ed.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher: The Process of Knowing, Vol. 6, National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC, pp. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human Cognition: Learning, Understanding, and Remembering, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, R.N., and Levin, J. R. (1998). Coming to terms with the keyword method in introductory psychology: A “neuromnemonic” example. Teaching Psychol. 25: 132–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, R. N., Levin, M. E., and Levin, J. R. (1993). Mnemonic strategies: Instructional techniques worth remembering. Teaching Except. Child. 25(4): 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clottes, J. (2001). France's magical ice age art: Chauvet cave. Nat. Geogr. 200(2): 104–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Rev. edn., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, H., Cambell, B., and Brown, R. (1988). Sectional drawings from science textbooks: An experimental investigation into pupils' understanding. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 58: 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J. E., and Massironi, M. (1998). Pictures and their special status in perceptual and cognitive inquiry. In Hochberg, J., Carterette, E., and Friedman, M. (eds.), Perception and Cognition at the Century's End: Handbook of Perception and Cognition, 2nd edn., Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. (1998). News concreteness and visual-verbal association: Do news pictures narrow the recall gap between concrete and abstract news? Hum. Comm. Res. 25: 180–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, R. S., and Kulhavy, R.W. (1981). The influence of spatial organization in prose learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 73: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretzke, B. J. (1993). Effects of pictorial mnemonic strategy usage on prose recall of young, middle-aged, and older adults. Educ. Gerontol. 19: 489–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (1996). Illustrations, text, and the child reader. What are pictures in children's storybooks for? Read. Horizons 37: 130–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., and Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. J. Mem. Lang. 31: 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K., Maras, L., and Birdseye, D. (1994). Look! Look! Who stole the pictures from the picture books? The basalization of picture books. New Advocate 7(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guri, S. (1985). The function of diagrams in learning from social science self-study texts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, March-April 1985.

  • Gyselinck, V., and Tardieu, H. (1994). Illustrations, mental models, and comprehension of instructional text. In Schnotz, W., and Kulhavy, R.W. (eds.), Comprehension and Graphics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyselinck, V., and Tardieu, H. (1999). The role of illustrations in text comprehension: What, when, for whom, and why? In van Oostendorp, H., and Goldman, S. R. (eds.), The Construction of Mental Operations During Reading, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higbee, K. L. (1988). Your Memory: How It Works and How to Improve It, 2nd edn., Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, L. C. (1979). Effects of strategy-oriented training on children's inference from pictures. Educ. Comm. Technol. J. 27: 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, E. (1999). The Heart of the Matter: The Use of Mnemonics and Analogies in Learning Science Text, Unpublished Masters Thesis, University ofWisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iding, M. K. (1997). Can questions facilitate learning from illustrated science texts? Read. Psychol. 18: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory explanations. In Cermak, L. S., and Craik, F. I. M. (eds.), Levels of Processing in Human Memory, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 429–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A. M., Levin, J. R., Shimron, J., and Guttman, J. (1975). Pictures and young children's learning from oral prose. J. Educ. Psychol. 67: 636–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, W. H. (1987). Research on pictures: A guide to the literature. In Willows, D. M., and Houghton, H. A. (eds.), The Psychology of Illustration: I. Basic Research, Springer, New York, pp. 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, W. H., and Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educ. Comm. Technol. J. 30: 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1980). Try a new method of vocabulary instruction. Weekly Reader (Teacher's Edition 4) 61(25): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1981). On functions of pictures in prose. In Pirozzolo, F. J., and Wittrock, M. C. (eds.), Neuropsychological and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Academic Press, New York, pp. 203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1982). Pictures as prose-learning devices. In Flammer, A., and Kintsch, W. (eds.), Discourse Processing, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 412–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1983). Pictorial strategies for school learning: Practical illustrations. In Pressley, M., and Levin, J. R. (eds.), Cognitive Strategy Research: Educational Applications, Springer, New York, pp. 213–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1986). Four cognitive principles of learning-strategy instruction. Educ. Psychol. 21: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1995). Stalking the wild mnemos: Research that's easy to remember. In Brannigan, G. G. (ed.), The Enlightened Educator: Research Adventures in the Schools, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R. (1998). How to remember (almost) everything. In Suid, M. (ed.), The Kids' How to Do (Almost) Everything Guide, Monday Morning Books, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 126–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., and Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In Willows, D. M., and Houghton, H. A. (eds.), The Psychology of Illustration: I. Basic Research, Springer, New York, pp. 51–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R., and Berry, J. K. (1980). Children's learning of all the news that's fit to picture. Educ. Comm. Technol. J. 28: 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R., Divine-Hawkins, P., Kerst, S. M., and Guttmann, J. (1974). Individual differences in learning from pictures and words: The development and application of an instrument. J. Educ. Psychol. 66: 296–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R., and Mayer, R. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In Britton, B. K., Woodward, A., and Brinkley, M. (eds.), Learning from Textbooks, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. R., Shriberg, L. K., and Berry, J. K. (1983). A concrete strategy for remembering abstract prose. Am. Educ. Res. J. 20: 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M. E., and Levin, J. R. (1990). Scientific mnemonomies: Methods for maximizing more than memory. Am. Educ. Res. J. 27: 301–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M. E., Rosenheck, M. B., and Levin, J. R. (1988). Mnemonic text-processing strategies: A teaching science for science teaching. Read. Psychol. 9: 343–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl, H., and Levin, J. R. (eds.) (1989). Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, N., Cooper, M., and Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. J. Educ. Psychol. 88: 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Dev. 50: 643–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1992). Illustrations that instruct. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology, Vol. 4, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 253–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., and Anderson, R. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., and Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 715–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., and Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. J. Educ. Psychol. 90: 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, C. B., and Levin, J. R. (1987). Mnemonic prose-learning strategies. In McDaniel, M. A., and Pressley, M. (eds.), Imagery and Related Mnemonic Processes: Theories, Individual Differences, and Applications, Springer, New York, pp. 392–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., and Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. J. Educ. Psychol. 87: 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollerenshaw, A., Aidman, E., and Kidd, G. (1997). Is an illustration always worth ten thousandwords? Effects of prior knowledge, learning style, and multimedia illustrations on text comprehension. Int. J. Instruct. Media 24: 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, Rinehart, & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual-Coding Approach, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., and Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cogn. Instruct. 1: 117–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learn. Instruct. 3: 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, A. (1995). Author, editor-in-chief, teacher: Patricia Lee Gauch. Teaching Pre K-8 26(1): 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. J., and Beveridge, M. (1990). Reading illustrated science texts: A micro-computer investigation of children's strategies. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 60: 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, D. R., Hayes, D. A., and McEneaney, J. E. (1988). Good and poor readers' use of explicitly cued graphic aids. J. Read. Behav. 20: 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renandya, W. A., Hwang, Y., Rich, J.D., Ruffalo, S. L., Levin, M. E., and Levin, J. R. (1993). Explorations in mnemonic mythology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, April 1993.

  • Riding, R. J., and Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 63: 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheck, M. B., Levin, M. E., and Levin, J. R. (1989). Learning botany concepts mnemonically: Seeing the forest and the trees. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubman, C. N., and Waters, H. S. (2000). A, B seeing: The role of reconstructive processes in children's comprehension monitoring. J. Educ. Psychol. 92: 503–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, N., Levin, J. R., and Beitzel, B. D. (2001). Can mnemonic strategies enhance students, processing and recall of integrated text? Unpublished manuscript.

  • Samuels, S. J. (1970). Effects of pictures on learning to read, comprehension and attitudes. Rev. Educ. Res. 40: 397–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L. (1980). The role of illustrations in reading comprehension. In Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C., and Brewer, W. F. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 503–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, L. R. (1998). How picture books work: A semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships. Children's Lit. Educ. 29: 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. D., and Elifson, J. M. (1986). Do pictures make a difference in college textbooks? Read. Horizons 26: 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewig, J. W. (1992). Reading pictures, reading text: Some similarities. New Advocate 5(1): 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddill, P. J., and McDaniel, M. A. (1992). Pictorial enhancement of text memory: Limitations imposed by picture type and comprehension skill. Mem. Cogn. 20: 472–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddill, P. J., McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (1988). Illustrations as adjuncts to prose: A test-appropriate processing approach. J. Educ. Psychol. 80: 457–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. Y., and Newlin, M. H. (2000). Characteristics of students who enroll and succeed in psychology web-based classes. J. Educ. Psychol. 92: 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmann, B. (1989). When good pictures fail: An information-processing approach to the effect of illustrations. In Mandl, H., and Levin, J. R. (eds.), Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmann, B., Paechter, M., and Hartmannsgruber, K. (1999). Structuring and sequencing of comples text-picture combinations. Europ. J. Psychol. Educ. 14: 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carney, R.N., Levin, J.R. Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students' Learning from Text. Educational Psychology Review 14, 5–26 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013176309260

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013176309260

Navigation