Abstract
The neurodiversity movement has so far been dominated by autistic people who believe their condition is not a disease to be treated and, if possible, cured, but rather a human specificity (like sex or race) that must be equally respected. Autistic self-advocates largely oppose groups of parents of autistic children and professionals searching for a cure for autism. This article discusses the positions of the pro-cure and anti-cure groups. It also addresses the emergence of autistic cultures and various issues concerning autistic identities. It shows how identity issues are frequently linked to a ‘neurological self-awareness’ and a rejection of psychological interpretations. It argues that the preference for cerebral explanations cannot be reduced to an aversion to psychoanalysis or psychological culture. Instead, such preference must be understood within the context of the diffusion of neuroscientific claims beyond the laboratory and their penetration in different domains of life in contemporary biomedicalized societies. Within this framework, neuroscientific theories, practices, technologies and therapies are influencing the ways we think about ourselves and relate to others, favoring forms of neurological or cerebral subjectivation. The article shows how neuroscientific claims are taken up in the formation of identities, as well as social and community networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
1 Muskie, creator of the Institute for the Study of the Neurologically Typical website, http://isnt.autistics.org
2 Dedication of Susanne Antonetta's book, A mind apart: Travels in a neurodiverse world (2005).
3 See URL: http://www.autism-society.org
4 See Dekker (2006), Wing (1997) and Shapiro (2006); see also the entry, ‘Autism Rights Movement’ in Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_rights_movement
5 The use of ‘person-first language’ generally supported by the disability rights movement is not always well seen by autism self-advocacy groups for whom the expression ‘a person with autism’ suggests that the ‘condition can be separated from the person’ (Sinclair, 1999). That is why, when referring to self-advocacy movements, I will use the terms ‘autistic’ or ‘autistic person’. See also Hacking (2009).
6 See URL: http://www.naar.org/naar.asp; http://www.cureautismnow.org; see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cure_Autism_Now
7 See URL: http://www.autismspeaks.org/index.php
8 See URL: http://everything2.com/title/neurotypical
9 To better understand the debate and the positions at play, see Chamak (2008), Clarke and van Amerom (2007, 2008), Silverman (2008a, 2008b) and the entry ‘Autism Rights Movement’ in Wikipedia.
10 ABA applies learning theory to improve ‘socially significant behaviors.’ It aims to promote the development of adaptive, pro-social conduct. See http://www.centerforautism.com/aba/whatisaba.asp
11 Consequently, some self-advocates made a petition to the United Nations in 2004, asking to be recognized as a ‘minority social group’ deserving protection against ‘discrimination’ and ‘inhuman treatment’ (Nelson, 2004).
12 See URL: http://www.neurodiversity.com
13 See URL: http://www.taaproject.com
14 See for instance the Natural Variation—Autism blog (http://autismnaturalvariation.blogspot.com). There is a very interesting discussion on this blog, on the 3 March 2009 post, about the differences between autistics who approve and disapprove of neurodiversity. The discussion was launched by the published report entitled ‘Neurodiversity in higher education: Insights from qualitative research’ by the BRAINHE project (Best Resources for Achievement and Intervention re Neurodiversity in Higher Education), a National Teaching Fellowship Scheme project funded by the Higher Education Academy in the UK (www.brainhe.com).
15 In his homepage, Mitchell presents himself as being ‘pro-cure, anti-neurodiversity, anti-special ed, anti-ABA’, and he adds, ‘I have something to piss off everybody! Therefore you can call me autism's gadfly!’ (http://www.jonathans-stories.com).
16 I am grateful to the anonymous referee that called my attention to this important distinction.
17 See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodiversity. Among the best-known and most vocal groups are http://www.neurodiversity.com and www.aspiesforfreedom.com, but groups and websites are multiplying in different countries and manifest various positions and national differences.
18 Amanda Baggs, who speaks through a voice syntheziser, became one of the best-known autism self-advocates after posting her video ‘In my language’, in January 2007, (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnylM1hI2jc). There is a growing controversy as to whether Baggs is really a person with autism and if she really made the video herself. See among others http://amandabaggscontroversy.blogspot.com/2009/07/amanda-baggs-controversy.html
19 See URL: http://isnt.autistics.org
20 Padden and Humphries (2006); see URL: http://www.wrongplanet.net and www.autisticculture.com for particularly interesting and informative websites.
21 See the entry, ‘Autistic Pride Day’ at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autistic_Pride_Day
22 A female diagnosed with autism testified that, after spending her teens ‘in a state of suicidal clinical depression as a result of bullying and feeling that I must be a failure or insane for being different’, she found this opinion ‘only reinforced by the psychotherapist I got sent to, who decided that all my problems must be the result of “sexual repression”’. Proud to have ‘walked out after six sessions’, she sees being diagnosed as an autistic as ‘the best thing’ that ever happened to her (quoted in Blume, 1997a).
23 See URL: www.agre.org
24 See URL: www.generationrescue.org
29 http://dannimatzk.co.uk (emphases added).
30 http://autism.change.org/blog/view/identity_politics_and_the_language_controversy (emphasis added).
32 ‘Snippet’ from Jane Meyerding's website, http://mjane.zolaweb.com/snipframe.html
35 See Metzinger (2009: 213); I am grateful to Nicolas Langlitz for calling my attention to this reference.
36 Whereas the radicalism of some self-advocates in the US, Canada and Australia seems to be walking toward the ‘dark side’ of identity politics by essentializing neurological uniqueness and typologizing brain difference, this does not seem to be the case in countries like France or Brazil.
References
Abi-Rached J.M. (2008a). The new brain sciences: Field or fields? Brain, Self and Society Paper No. 2, BIOS (Centre for the Study of Bioscience, Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Society), London School of Economics. URL (accessed August 2009): www.lse.ac.uk/collections/brainSelfSociety/publications.htm
Abi-Rached J.M. (2008b). The implications of the new brain sciences. EMBO Reports, 912, 1158–1162.
Antonetta S. (2005). A mind apart: Travels in a neurodiverse world. London: Penguin.
Ariel C.N., & Naseef R.A. (Eds) (2006). Voices from the spectrum: Parents, grandparents, siblings, people with autism, and professionals share their wisdom. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
Bagatell N. (2007). Orchestrating voices: Autism, identity and the power of discourse. Disability & Society, 22, 413–426.
Baron-Cohen S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248–254.
Biever C. (2007). Let's meet tomorrow in Second Life. NewScientist, 2610, 26–27.
Blume H. (1997a). Autism and the internet, or, It's the wiring, stupid. URL (accessed June 2007): web.mit.edu/comm-forum/papers/blume.html
Blume H. (1997b). Autistics, freed from face-to-face encounters, are communicating in cyberspace. New York Times 30 June. URL (accessed December 2008): www.nytimes.com/1997/06/30/business/autistics-freed-from-face-to-face-encounters-are-communicating-in-cyberspace.html
Brownlow C.L. (2007). The construction of the autistic individual: Investigations in online discussion groups. PhD thesis, University of Brighton.
Brownlow C., & O'Dell L. (2006). Constructing an autistic identity: AS voices online. Mental Retardation, 44, 315–321.
Bumiller K. (2008). Quirky citizens: Autism, gender, and reimagining disability. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 33, 967–991.
Chamak B. (2008). Autism and social movements: French parents’ associations and international autistic individuals’ organizations. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30, 76–96.
Chamak B., Bonniaua B., Jaunay E., & Cohen D. (2008). What can we learn about autism from autistic persons? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 77, 271–279.
Charlton J. (2000). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cheu J. (2004). De-gene-erates, replicants and other aliens: (Re)defining disability in futuristic film. In Corker M., & Shakespeare T. (Eds), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory, 198–212. London: Continuum.
Churchland P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 67–90.
Clarke J., & van Amerom G. (2007). ‘Surplus suffering’: Differences between organizational understandings of Asperger's syndrome and those people who claim the ‘disorder’. Disability & Society, 22, 761–776.
Clarke J., & van Amerom G. (2008). Asperger's Syndrome: Differences between parents’ understanding and those diagnosed. Social Work in Health Care, 46(3), 85–106.
Corker M. (1999). New disability discourse, the principle of optimization and social change. In Corker M., & French S. (Eds), Disability discourse, 192–209. Buckingham: Open UP.
Corker M., & French S. (Eds) (1999). Disability discourse. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open UP.
Corker M., & Shakespeare T. (Eds) (2004). Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory. London, New York: Continuum.
Davidson J. (2007) ‘In a world of her own …’: Re-presenting alienation and emotion in the lives and writings of women with autism. Gender, Place and Culture, 14, 659–677.
Davidson J. (2008). Autistic culture online: Virtual communication and cultural expression on the spectrum. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(7), 791–806.
Davis L.J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness and the body. London: Verso.
Davis L.J. (2002). Bending over backwards: Disability, dismodernism, and other difficult positions. New York: New York UP.
Dawson M. (2004). The misbehavior of behaviorists: Ethical challenges to the autism-ABA industry. URL (accessed June 2007): web.archive.org/web/20051205014407/www.sentex.net/~nexus23/naa_aba.html
Dekker M. (2006). On our own terms: Emerging autistic culture. URL (accessed December 2007): autisticculture.com/index.php?page=articles
Dumit J. (2003). Is it me or my brain? Depression and neuroscientific facts. Journal of Medical Humanities, 24, 35–48.
Dumit J. (2004). Picturing personhood: Brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
Ehrenberg A. (2004). Le Sujet cerebral. Esprit, 309, 130–155.
Feinberg E., & Vacca J. (2000). The drama and trauma of creating policies on autism: Critical issues to consider in the new millennium. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 15(3), 130–137.
Fombonne E. (2003). Modern views on autism. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(8), 503–506.
Foucault M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Martin L.H., Gutman H., & Hutton P.H. (Eds), Technologies of the self, 16–49. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Freeman B.J., & Cronin P. (2002). Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder in young children: An update. Infants and Young Children, 14(3), 1–10.
Gibbon S., & Novas C. (2008). Introduction: Biosocialities, genetics and the social sciences. In Gibbon S., & Novas C. (Eds), Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences, 1–18. London: Routledge.
Goggin G., & Newell C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Goggin G., & Noonan T. (2006). Blogging disability: The interface between new cultural movements and internet technology. In Bruns A., & Jacobs J. (Ed.), Uses of blogs, 161–172. New York: Peter Lang.
Grandin T. (1995). Thinking in pictures: And other reports from my life with autism. New York: Vintage Books.
Hacking I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In Sperber D., Premack D., & James-Premack A. (Eds), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary approach, 351–383. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hacking I. (2002). Making up people. Historical Ontology, 99–114. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Hacking I. (2006). What is Tom saying to Maureen? London Review of Books, 28(9). URL (accessed May 2007): www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n09/hack01_.html
Hacking I. (2009). Autistic autobiography. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 364, 1467–1473.
Harmon A. (2004a). Adults and autism: An answer, but not a cure, for a social disorder. New York Times, 29 April.
Harmon A. (2004b). Neurodiversity forever: The disability movement turns to brains. New York Times, 9 May.
Harmon A. (2004c). How about not ‘curing’ us, some autistics are pleading. New York Times, 20 December.
Jones R., & Meldal T.O. (2001). Social relationships and Asperger's syndrome: A qualitative analysis of first-hand accounts. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 5, 35–41.
Jones R.S.P., Zahl A., & Huws J.C., (2001). First-hand accounts of emotional experiences in autism: A qualitative analysis. Disability & Society, 16, 393–401.
Jurecic A. (2007). Neurodiversity. College English, 69, 421–442.
Kenway I.M. (2009). Blessing or curse? Autism and the rise of the internet. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, 13, 94–103.
Kirmayer L.J. (1988). Mind and body as metaphors: Hidden values in biomedicine. In Lock M. and Gordon D.R. (Eds), Biomedicine examined, 57–93. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lage A. (2006). Autistas usam remédios para controlar aspectos da doença. Folha OnLine, 27 July. URL (accessed December 2007): www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/equilibrio/noticias/ult263u4160.shtml
Luhrmann T.M. (2000). Of two minds: The growing disorder in American psychiatry. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Martin E. (2000). Mind–body problems. American Ethnologist, 27, 569–590.
Martin E. (2007). Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
Martin E. (2009). Identity, identification, and the brain. Presented at the workshop ‘Neurocultures’, Max Planck Institute of the History of Science, Berlin, 20–22 February.
Merzenich M.M., & Jenkins W.M. (1994), Cortical representations of learned behaviors. In Andersen P., Hvalby O., Paulsen O., & Hokfelt B. (Eds), Memory concepts, 437–454. New York: Elsevier.
Metzinger T. (2009). The ego tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York: Perseus Book Group.
Meyerding J. (1998). Thoughts on finding myself differently brained. URL (accessed July 2009): mjane.zolaweb.com/diff.html
Meyerding J. (2003). The great ‘why label?’ debate. URL (accessed July 2009): mjane.zolaweb.com/label.html
Miller D., & Slater D. (2000). The internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
Nadesan M.H. (2005) Constructing autism: Unravelling the ‘truth’ and understanding the social. London and New York: Routledge.
Nelson A. (2004). Declaration from the autism community that they are a minority group. URL (accessed August 2008): www.prweb.com/releases/2004/11/prweb179444.htm
Newschaffer C.J., & Curran L.K. (2003). Autism: An emerging public health problem. Public Health Reports, 118(5), 393–399.
Ortega F. (forthcoming). Toward a genealogy of neuroascesis. In Ortega F., & Vidal F. . Neurocultures. Glimpses into an Expanding Universe. Frankfurt and New York: Peter Lang.
Ortega F., & Vidal F. (2007). Mapping the cerebral subject in contemporary culture. RECIIS—Electronic Journal of Communication Information & Innovation in Health, 2, 255–259.
Osteen M. (Ed.) (2008). Autism and representation. New York: Routledge.
Padden C., & Humphries T. (2006). Inside deaf culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Rabinow P. (1992). Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In Crary J., & Kwinter S. (Eds), Incorporations, 234–252. New York: Zone Books.
Rees D., & Rose S. (Eds) (2004). The new brain sciences: Perils and prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Rodriguez P. (2006). Talking brains: A cognitive semantic analysis of an emerging folk neuropsychology. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 301–330.
Rose N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
Rosenberg C.E. (2006). Contested boundaries: Psychiatry, disease, and diagnosis. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49, 407–424.
Rubin S. (2005). Acceptance versus cure. CNN.com. URL (accessed September 2009): www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/presents/shows/autism.world/notebooks/sue/notebook.html
Shapiro J. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Random House.
Shapiro J. (2006). Autism movement seeks acceptance, not cures. URL (accessed December 2007): www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5488463
Silberman S. (2001). The Geek syndrome. Wired, 9(12). URL (accessed December 2007): www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aspergers.html
Silverman C. (2008a). Brains, pedigrees and promises: Lessons from the politics of autism genetics. In Gibbon S., & Novas C. (Eds), Biosocialities, genetics and the social sciences: Making biologies and identities, 38–55. London: Routledge.
Silverman C. (2008b). Fieldwork on another planet: Social science perspectives on the autism spectrum. BioSocieties, 3, 325–341.
Sinclair J. (1993). Don't mourn for us. Voice, 1(3). URL (accessed December 2007): ani.autistics.org/dont_mourn.html
Sinclair J. (1999). Why I dislike ‘person first’ language. URL (accessed January 2009): web.syr.edu/~jisincla/person_first.htm
Sinclair J. (2005). Autism network international: The development of a community and its culture. URL (accessed December 2007): web.syr.edu/~jisincla/History_of_ANI.html
Singer J. (1999). Why can't you be normal for once in your life? From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference. In Corker M., & French S. (Eds), Disability discourse, 59–67. Buckingham: Open UP.
Singer J. (2007). Light and dark: Correcting the balance. URL (accessed June 2008): www.neurodiversity.com.au
Solomon A. (2008). The Autism Rights Movement. New York Magazine, 25 May. URL (accessed August 2009): nymag.com/news/features/47225
Swain J., & Cameron C. (1999). Unless otherwise stated: Discourses of labeling and identity in coming out. In Corker M., & French S. (Eds), Disability discourse, 68–78. Buckingham: Open UP.
Valenstein E.S. (1998). Blaming the brain: The truth about drugs and mental health. New York: The Free Press.
Valentine G., Skelton T., & Butler R. (2003). Coming out and outcomes: Negotiating lesbian and gay identities with, and in, the family. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21, 479–499.
Vidal F. (2009). Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences, 22, 5–36.
Vrecko S. (2006). Folk neurology and the remaking of identity. Molecular Interventions, 6, 300–303.
Waltz M. (2005). Reading case studies of people with autistic spectrum disorders: A cultural studies approach to issues of disability representation. Disability & Society, 20, 421–435.
Weintraub K. (2005). A mother's perspective. URL (accessed June 2008): web.archive.org/web/20051216174906/http://asatonline.org/resources/library/moms_perspective.html
Wickelgren I. (2005). Autistic brains out of synch? Science, 308, 1856–1858.
Wilson S., & Peterson L. (2002). The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 449–467.
Wing L. (1997). The history of ideas on autism: Legends, myths and reality. Autism, 1, 13–23.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Pietro Barbetta, Suparna Choudhury, Nicolas Langlitz, Enrico Valtellina, Fernando Vidal and Rafaela Zorzanelli. This article was partly researched and written at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin, which I thank for its hospitality and support. Project website: www.brainhood.net
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ortega, F. The Cerebral Subject and the Challenge of Neurodiversity. BioSocieties 4, 425–445 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855209990287
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855209990287