Elsevier

Consciousness and Cognition

Volume 13, Issue 3, September 2004, Pages 610-612
Consciousness and Cognition

Commentary
Cross-modal facilitation is not specific to self-face recognition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.04.001Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (9)

  • S.M. Platek et al.

    Cross-modal self recognition: The role of visual, auditory, and olfactory primes

    Consciousness and Cognition

    (2004)
  • S. Brédart et al.

    An interactive activation model of face naming

    The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1995)
  • A.M. Burton et al.

    Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model

    British Journal of Psychology

    (1990)
  • A.M. Burton et al.

    I recognize your face but I can't remember your name: A simple explanation?

    British Journal of Psychology

    (1992)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (7)

  • Preferential processing of self-relevant stimuli occurs mainly at the perceptual and conscious stages of information processing

    2016, Consciousness and Cognition
    Citation Excerpt :

    In contrast, these cross-modal priming effects were absent for familiar and unknown faces (Platek, Thomson, & Gallup, 2004). This result suggests that preferential conceptual processing is specific to self; however, other studies have shown that conceptual priming facilitates the recognition of any familiar person, which undermines the specificity of preferential conceptual self-access (e.g., Boehm & Sommer, 2012; Brédart, 2004). As a consequence, the precise role of post-perceptual factors in self-preferential processing is unknown.

  • The free-energy self: A predictive coding account of self-recognition

    2014, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    Self-recognition should therefore also be plastic, such that surprising sensory events may be explained away by changes in how sensory inputs that are “self” or “other” are processed. Traditionally, self-recognition is measured using self-other detection tasks, self-other morphing tasks (where participants stop a video morph between self and other when it looks more like “me”), or masked priming tasks where reaction times are compared between self and other related primes (Bredart, 2004; Devue and Bredart, 2008; Devue et al., 2009; Frassinetti et al., 2008; Heinisch et al., 2011; Keenan et al., 2000, 1999; Kircher et al., 2001; Pannese and Hirsch, 2010, 2011; Rotshtein et al., 2005; Tsakiris, 2008). All of these methods converge on the notion of a self-bias, with self-stimuli being more salient and processed faster.

  • Self-specific priming effect

    2010, Consciousness and Cognition
View all citing articles on Scopus

Commentary on Platek, S. M., Thomson, J. W., Gallup, G. G. (2004). Cross-modal self recognition: The role of visual, auditory, and olfactory primes. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 197–210.

View full text