PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Chrystal Jaye
AU  - Isabelle Lomax-Sawyers
AU  - Jessica Young
AU  - Richard Egan
TI  - The people speak: social media on euthanasia/assisted dying
AID  - 10.1136/medhum-2018-011565
DP  - 2021 Mar 01
TA  - Medical Humanities
PG  - 47--55
VI  - 47
IP  - 1
4099  - http://mh.bmj.com/content/47/1/47.short
4100  - http://mh.bmj.com/content/47/1/47.full
SO  - J Med Humanit2021 Mar 01; 47
AB  - In New Zealand, aiding and abetting a person to commit suicide or euthanasia even with consent is unlawful. The introduction of a third Bill on assisted dying to the House of Representatives following a high-profile court case afforded an opportunity for examining how assisted dying was discussed in the public sphere. In this article, we report on a discourse analysis of a selection of social media to illustrate the ways in which citizens participate in the voluntary euthanasia debate. The volume of social media posts that made up our data set suggests that the legalisation of assisted dying is a highly topical and deeply salient societal issue. Social media postings represent the voices of ordinary citizens who may not participate in formal public consultation processes. Based on our analysis, the assignment of binary conclusions about public opinion is simplistic and fails to adequately represent the intricacies of public debate. Contributors’ posts reveal deeply held sociocultural values, as well as tensions about the relationship between citizens and the apparatus of government.