PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Michael Sharpe
AU  - Monica Greco
TI  - Chronic fatigue syndrome and an illness-focused approach to care: controversy, morality and paradox
AID  - 10.1136/medhum-2018-011598
DP  - 2019 Jun 01
TA  - Medical Humanities
PG  - 183--187
VI  - 45
IP  - 2
4099  - http://mh.bmj.com/content/45/2/183.short
4100  - http://mh.bmj.com/content/45/2/183.full
SO  - J Med Humanit2019 Jun 01; 45
AB  - Contemporary medicine distinguishes between illness and disease. Illness refers to a person’s subjective experience of symptoms; disease refers to objective bodily pathology. For many illnesses, medicine has made great progress in finding and treating associated disease. However, not all illnesses are successfully relieved by treating the disease. In some such cases, the patient’s suffering can only be reduced by treatment that is focused on the illness itself. Chronic disabling fatigue is a common symptom of illness, for which disease-focused treatment is often not effective, but for which illness-focused treatments (psychological or behavioural) often are. In this article, we explore a controversy surrounding illness-focused treatments for fatigue. We do this by contrasting their acceptance by people whose fatigue is associated with a disease (using the example of cancer-related fatigue) with their controversial rejection by some people whose fatigue is not associated with an established disease (chronic fatigue syndrome or CFS, sometimes called ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis)). In order to understand this difference in acceptability we consider the differing moral connotations of illness and disease and then go on to examine the limitations of the concepts of illness and disease themselves. We conclude that a general acceptance of illness-focused treatments by all who might benefit from them will require a major long-term change in thinking about illness, but that improvements to the care of individual patients can be made today.