TY - JOUR T1 - Pharmaceuticals and modern statecraft in South Africa: the cases of opium, thalidomide and contraception. JF - Medical Humanities JO - J Med Humanit SP - 253 LP - 262 DO - 10.1136/medhum-2018-011478 VL - 44 IS - 4 AU - Julie Parle AU - Rebecca Hodes AU - Thembisa Waetjen Y1 - 2018/12/01 UR - http://mh.bmj.com/content/44/4/253.abstract N2 - This article provides a history of three pharmaceuticals in the making of modern South Africa. Borrowing and adapting Arthur Daemmrich’s term ‘pharmacopolitics’, we examine how forms of pharmaceutical governance became integral to the creation and institutional practices of this state. Through case studies of three medicaments: opium (late 19th to early 20th century), thalidomide (late 1950s to early 1960s) and contraception (1970s to 2010s), we explore the intertwining of pharmaceutical regulation, provision and consumption. Our focus is on the modernist imperative towards the rationalisation of pharmaceutical oversight, as an extension of the state’s bureaucratic and ideological objectives, and, importantly, as its obligation. We also explore adaptive and illicit uses of medicines, both by purveyors of pharmaceuticals, and among consumers. The historical sweep of our study allows for an analysis of continuities and changes in pharmaceutical governance. The focus on South Africa highlights how the concept of pharmacopolitics can usefully be extended to transnational—as well as local—medical histories. Through the diversity of our sources, and the breadth of their chronology, we aim to historicise modern pharmaceutical practices in South Africa, from the late colonial era to the Post-Apartheid present. ER -