PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Clemet Askheim AU - Tony Sandset AU - Eivind Engebretsen TI - Who cares? The lost legacy of Archie Cochrane AID - 10.1136/medhum-2016-011037 DP - 2017 Mar 01 TA - Medical Humanities PG - 41--46 VI - 43 IP - 1 4099 - http://mh.bmj.com/content/43/1/41.short 4100 - http://mh.bmj.com/content/43/1/41.full SO - J Med Humanit2017 Mar 01; 43 AB - Over the last 20 years, the evidence-based medicine (EBM) movement has sought to develop standardised approaches to patient treatment by drawing on research results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The Cochrane Collaboration and its eponym, Archie Cochrane, have become symbols of this development, and Cochrane's book Effectiveness and Efficiency from 1972 is often referred to as the first sketch of what was to become EBM. In this article, we claim that this construction of EBM's historical roots is based on a selective reading of Cochrane's text. Through a close reading of this text, we show that the principal aim of modern EBM, namely to warrant clinical decisions based on evidence drawn from RCTs, is not part of Cochrane's original project. He had more modest ambitions for what RCTs can accomplish, and, more importantly, he was more concerned with care and equality than are his followers in the EBM movement. We try to reconstruct some of Cochrane's lost legacy and to articulate some of the important silences in Effectiveness and Efficiency. From these clues it might be possible, we argue, to remodel EBM in a broader, more pluralistic, more democratic and less authoritarian manner.