Article Text

Download PDFPDF
‘Are you pregnant? If not, why not?’: artificial reproductive technology and the trauma of infertility
  1. Soumya Kashyap1,
  2. Priyanka Tripathi2
  1. 1Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar, India
  2. 2Department of Humanities and Social Science, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Priyanka Tripathi; priyankatripathi{at}iitp.ac.in

Abstract

The article scrutinises Rohini S. Rajagopal’s work, what’s a lemon squeezer doing in my vagina (2021), to illustrate the escalating medicalisation of infertile bodies. In a cultural context where reproductive concerns are construed as medical disorders demanding treatment and surveillance, medical professionals and pharmaceutical companies exploit these sociocultural dynamics to provide infertile couples with immediate solutions through Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Consequently, the study contributes a critical perspective to the field of medical humanities, initiating a nuanced discourse that interrogates the impact of terms such as ‘living laboratories’, ‘baby machine’, ‘mother machine’ and ‘hope technology’ on our comprehension of future motherhood. Drawing on feminist critiques of medicalisation, the article argues that biotechnology perpetuates the eighteenth-century biomedical metaphor of the body as a machine with replaceable parts. Notably, contemporary advancements in reproductive medicine allow for the replacement of perceived ‘flawed’ body parts, further objectifying them within this framework.

  • obstetrics
  • Art
  • Gender studies

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

No data are available.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both authors confirm their authorship for this paper. SK is the first author of this submission. She has been involved in the paper’s conception, composition and structure orientation with PT, who is the second author of this paper. T has significantly shaped, structured and analysed this article. SK is the guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.