Article Text

Download PDFPDF
In many voices: exploring end-of-life care through patient, caregiver and physician narratives
  1. Tracy Moniz1,
  2. Carolyn Melro1,
  3. Chris Watling2
  1. 1Communication Studies, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  2. 2Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Tracy Moniz, Communication Studies, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Tracy.Moniz{at}msvu.ca

Abstract

As the focus on end-of-life care intensifies, so too does the need to better understand the experiences of patients, caregivers and physicians. Delivering empathetic care requires a shared understanding of illness and its meaning and impact. The narratives of patients, caregivers and physicians each offer a distinct perspective on clinical experiences, yet comparative research is uncommon. This study compares written narratives about end-of-life illness and care by these groups.

We created an archive of 332 first-person written narratives about end of life (patient=65, caregiver=156, physician=111) published between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 through searching public domains (eg, national newspapers), personal blogs, and academic and literary journals in Canada. A comparative narrative analysis was conducted for patterns of content (eg, theme) and strategy (eg, characterisation).

All three groups wrote about feeling gratitude. Patients also emphasised coping with change and carrying on. Caregivers further focused on grieving loss, and physicians most often wrote about valuing humanism. Physicians were most likely to ascribe agency to someone (ie, patients) or something (ie, death) other than themselves and to decentre themselves in the story. Patients and physicians most often made the patient the main character of their stories, while caregivers were as likely to centre the story on themselves as on the patient. Physicians were most likely to describe death as a source of tension, while patients and caregivers described the illness experience, often comparing it to battle. Physicians and caregivers tended to write testimonies, while patients wrote quests.

Narrative research can illuminate unique aspects of end-of-life care. While death is a shared experience, each group approaches it differently. The disconnects have potential consequences for how end of life is experienced—whether patients’ values are honoured, whether caregivers receive support, and whether physicians experience burn-out. We need to foster learning experiences that integrate these unique perspectives into medical education and practice, including leveraging the affordances of studying written narratives towards this end.

  • patient narratives
  • physician narratives
  • End of life care
  • Medical humanities

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @moniztracy1

  • Contributors All authors (TM, CM and CW) meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship. All authors have contributed to the planning, conduct and reporting of the work described in the article. TM is responsible for the overall content as guarantor. The corresponding author (TM) attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

  • Funding This research was funded by an Insight Development Grant (430-2019-0442) from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.