Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
When numbers eclipse narratives: a cultural-political critique of the ‘ethical’ impacts of short-term experiences in global health in Dominican Republic bateyes
  1. Brenda K Wilson
  1. Global Health Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Brenda K Wilson, Global Health Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; bkw0621{at}gmail.com

Abstract

With the rising demand for short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) is an ever-increasing volume of literature that focuses attention on ethics and ethical concerns, such as the effects of STEGH on host populations. Such concerns have driven the development of ethical principles and guidelines, with discussions and debates largely centred around normative questions of positive/negative and benefit/harm for us/them. Using a critical medical humanities lens, this paper blurs these dichotomous framings and offers a more complex understanding of the effects and effectiveness of STEGH on hosts. I explore STEGH that send volunteers from North American universities to the Dominican Republic to participate in service-learning activities aimed at improving the lives of impoverished Haitian migrants living in bateyes. I address the following questions: What perspectives about the impacts of interventions on host communities manifest through STEGH? What tensions emerge through interactions among diverse stakeholders related to those perspectives, and with what effects? Drawing together critical theory and ethnography, I examined the perspectives of three stakeholder groups: student and faculty volunteers, host organisation staff, and hosts in batey communities. Data collected from observations and interviews were counterposed; I analysed interactions and interplay between stakeholders. My findings revealed conflicts around an emergent theme: counting efforts, or volunteers’ proclivity for numerical evidence of impactful STEGH for hosts. With attention on power relations, I argue that a preoccupation with quantifiable evidence eclipsed and erased the lived realities of hosts, thereby blocking a fully ethical engagement. These sociopolitical effects, often overlooked in conventional ethics assessments, are no less harmful and may reinforce rather than reduce inequalities that the global health movement seeks to eliminate. My study offers a compelling case for how the critical medical humanities lend critical insights in the name of improving global health.

  • politics
  • medical humanities
  • rhetoric of bioethics
  • medical anthropology
  • health care education

Data availability statement

Summaries of interview findings are presented in the manuscript. Full transcripts of interviews (raw data) are available upon reasonable request. Data are not in a repository, but corresponding author may be contacted by email or using the ORCID identifier.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Summaries of interview findings are presented in the manuscript. Full transcripts of interviews (raw data) are available upon reasonable request. Data are not in a repository, but corresponding author may be contacted by email or using the ORCID identifier.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @BrendaKWilson

  • Contributors BKW, the guarantor, is responsible for the overall content as well as the design and implementation of the study, data collection and interpretation, and writing of the paper. In addition, Dr. Rebecca Hester and Dr. Arlene Macdonald contributed to the study, having served as scientific advisors and critical reviewers of the study proposal and final report. The author is also grateful for the contributions made by her interpreter in the Dominican Republic, Marie-Ange Magliore.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Refer to the Methods section for further details.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.