You are here

Article Text

Article menu

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Time considered as a helix of infinite possibilities
  1. Jay Clayton1,2
  1. 1Curb Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  2. 2English, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jay Clayton, Curb Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; jay.clayton{at}vanderbilt.edu

Abstract

This article explores the temporal implications of genomics through the lens of a classic science fiction story by Samuel R Delany, ‘Time Considered as a Helix of Semi-Precious Stones’. Delany’s futuristic vision of ‘hologramic information storage’, which allows the interplanetary Special Services to discover and predict everything a suspect has done or will be doing at any time in the past, present or future resembles ‘genome time’, the illusion that data encoded in your DNA can reveal your entire life—not only where you came from but what you will become—and that it is knowable from a single test in the present. The temporal implications of genomics are compared with ‘queer time’ and contrasted with the temporal implications of nanoscience and climate change in order to clarify what is distinctive about genome time. In conclusion, some practical consequences of genome time are discussed.

  • queer theory
  • genetics
  • literature
  • literary theory

Data availability statement

There are no data in this work.

https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2020-012063

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    There are no data in this work.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. References have been amended.

    • Funding This paper was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health for Genetic Privacy and Identity in Community Settings, 5RM1HG009034.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.