Abstract

In the late twentieth century, increasing numbers of women in wealthy nations waited until they were aged in their 30s to give birth and become parents. This article examines responses to the changing demographics of maternity among social researchers, doctors, pregnant women and mothers in Aotearoa New Zealand. The article analyses raw research data from historical social survey projects The Right Time (interviews completed in 1982–1983) and Motherhood After 30 (1987) by the grassroots organisation the Society for Research on Women in New Zealand.

Surveys, statistics and increasingly direct evidence from research participants symbolised modern social life in the mid-twentieth century. Yet, in 1966, women in Wellington, New Zealand concluded that they had been largely ignored in this endeavour. A group of volunteers pledged to produce the missing data and therefore improve policy making. This article analyses the Society’s publications and interview schedules to uncover how researchers, medics, pregnant women and mothers forged new connections between age, pregnancy and parenting during the 1980s. During this time, pregnant women advocated for a new model of prepared and mature maternity. A few years on, however, many among them identified the persistence of traditional gender roles that disrupted their plans. At the same time, physicians and public health officials in wealthy nations began to teach women to associate conception at older ages with increased risks, especially of genetic anomalies. Social research archives reveal tensions between these new, population-level recommendations and women’s proactive approaches to planning their lives and families. New Zealand’s distinctive survey records help to explain the impacts of new medical tests, reproductive technologies and public health recommendations in the context of women’s fresh approaches to maternity during the 1980s.