You are here

Article info

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Current controversy
The dying patient: taboo, controversy and missing terms of reference for designers—an architectural perspective

Authors

  1. Correspondence to Annie Bellamy, Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK; bellamyas{at}cardiff.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Bellamy A, Clark S, Anstey S
The dying patient: taboo, controversy and missing terms of reference for designers—an architectural perspective
Medical Humanities 2022;48:e2-e9.

Publication history

  • Accepted September 29, 2020
  • First published November 16, 2020.
Online issue publication 
February 21, 2022

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This article is made freely available for personal use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage