A patient-centred approach has gained increasing interest in medicine and other health sciences. Whereas there are discussions about the meaning of a patient-centred approach and what the concept entails, little is known about how the patient as a person is understood in patient-centred care. This article investigates understandings of the patient as a self in patient-centred care through physiotherapy of patients with chronic muscle pain. The material consists of interviews with five Norwegian physiotherapists working in a rehabilitation clinic. Drawing on Kristeva’s discussion of subjectivity in medical discourse, the study highlights two different treatment storylines that were closely entwined. One storyline focuses on open singular healing processes in which the treatment was based on openness to a search for meaning and sharing. In this storyline, the “person“ at the centre of care was not essentialised in terms of biological mechanisms, but rather considered as a vulnerable, irrational and moving self. By contrast, the second storyline focused on goal-oriented interventions aimed at restoring the patient to health. Here, the person in the centre of the treatment was shaped according to model narratives about “the successful patient”; the empowered, rational, choosing and self-managing individual. As such, the findings revealed two conflicting concepts of the individual patient inherent in patient-centred care. On the one hand, the patient is seen as being a person in constant movement, and on the other, they are captured by more standardised terms designed to focus on a more stable notion of outcome of illness. Therefore, our study suggests that the therapists’ will to recognise the individual in patient-centred care had a counterpart involving a marginalisation of the singular.
- health care education
- philosophy of medicine/health care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors BA planned the study, conducted the interviews and drafted the paper. BA, AMM, EE and DN have contributed in the analysing process and in developing the paper as a whole. BA submitted the paper and is responsible for the overall content of the article.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.