Article Text

PDF

Can Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein be read as an early research ethics text?
  1. H Davies
  1. Correspondence to:
 H Davies
 40 Avenell Road, London N5 1DP, UK; hugh.daviescorec.org.uk

Abstract

The current, popular view of the novel Frankenstein is that it describes the horrors consequent upon scientific experimentation; the pursuit of science leading inevitably to tragedy. In reality the importance of the book is far from this. Although the evil and tragedy resulting from one medical experiment are its theme, a critical and fair reading finds a more balanced view that includes science’s potential to improve the human condition and reasons why such an experiment went awry. The author argues that Frankenstein is an early and balanced text on the ethics of research upon human subjects and that it provides insights that are as valid today as when the novel was written. As a narrative it provides a gripping story that merits careful analysis by those involved in medical research and its ethical review, and it is more enjoyable than many current textbooks! To support this thesis, the author will place the book in historical, scientific context, analyse it for lessons relevant to those involved in research ethics today, and then draw conclusions.

  • GAfREC, Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees
  • IRB, institutional review board
  • REC, research ethics committee
  • Frankenstein
  • scientific experimentation
  • research ethics
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Page numbers after quotations in the novel are those in the Penguin Classic edition.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles