Skip to main content
Log in

The doctor and the literary text — potentials and pitfalls

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expectations are growing that literature may contribute to clinical skills. Narrative medicine is a quickly expanding area of research. However, many people remain sceptical to the idea of literature having a capacity to “save the life of medicine”. It is therefore urgent to scrutinize both the arguments in favour of and those against the potential of literature for increasing medical understanding. This article attempts to do this. It does in fact support the assertion that literature is important, but it stresses precisely its character of potential. There is no simple connection between acquaintance with literary texts and understanding of the different aspects of medical work. Much more need to be known about the conditions which allow the experiences residing in texts to be transformed into lived personal knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlzén, R. and C-M. Stolt: 2001, 'Poetry, Interpretation and Unpredictability: A Reply to Neil Pickering', Medical Humanities 27, pp. 47–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, W.: 1988, The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon, R.: 2000, 'Reading, Writing and Doctoring: Literature and Medicine', The American Journal of Medical Sciences 319 (5), pp. 285–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elam, K.: 2001, Emotions as a Mode of Understanding: An Essay in Philosophical Aesthetics. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.: 2001, 'The Medical Body as Philosophy's Arena', Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22, pp. 17–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G.: 1989, Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalg, T. and B. Hurwitz: 1998, Narrative Based Medicine: Dialogue and Discourse in Clinical Practice. London: BMJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, H.: 1907, The Art of the Novel. New York.

  • Lagercrantz, O.: 1985, Om konsten att läsa och skriva. Stockholm: W&W.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S.: 1942, Philosophy in a New Key. A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art. Cambridge, Mass.

  • Midgeley, M.: 2001, Science and Poetry. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.: 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brian, P.: 1991, Desolation Island. Norton & Company.

  • Pickering, N.: 2000, 'The Use of Poetry in Health Care Ethics Education', Medical Humanities 26, pp. 31–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A.: 2000, 'The Relationship Between the Arts and Medicine', Medical Humanities 25, pp. 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svenaeus, F.: 1999, The Hermeneutics of Medicine and the Phenomenology of Health: Steps Towards a Philosophy of Medical Practice. Linköping Studies in Art and Science.

  • Toulmin, S.: 1993 'Knowledge and Art in the Practice of Medicine: Clinical Judgement and Historical Reconstruction', in: C. Delkeskamp-Hayes and M.A. Gardell (eds.), Science, Technology and the Art of Medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad Publ., pp. 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranströmer, T: 1964, Sanningsbarriären. Stockholm: Bonniers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautman, J.: 1982, 'The Wonders of Literature in Medical Education', Mobius 2, pp. 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahlzén, R. The doctor and the literary text — potentials and pitfalls. Med Health Care Philos 5, 147–155 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016027904865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016027904865

Navigation