Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations?*
References (19)
Understanding investigative clinical trials
J Vasc Surg
(1989)- et al.
Surgeon-related variables and the clinical trial
Lancet
(1978) The surgical mystique and the double standard: controlled trials of medical and surgical therapy for cardiac disease: analysis, hypothesis, proposal
Am Heart J
(1973)- et al.
Clinical studies in surgical journals: Have we improved?
Dis Colon Rectum
(1993) Randomized clinical trials in the evaluation of surgical innovation
J Neurosurg
(1979)The rise and fall of the random controlled trial in surgery
Theory Surg
(1989)- et al.
Randomized controlled trials in surgery
Surgery
(1994) - et al.
At what level of collective equipoise does a clinical trial become ethical
J Med Ethics
(1991) Practical statistics for medical research
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (250)
Research Concepts and Opportunities for Early-Career Investigators in Cardiac Surgery
2024, Annals of Thoracic SurgeryQuo vadis, foot & ankle research? A review
2023, Foot and Ankle SurgeryManagement of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: How real-world evidence can help to lift off barriers
2023, Journal of NeuroradiologyChallenges to Randomized Trials in Adult and Congenital Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery
2022, Annals of Thoracic SurgeryCitation Excerpt :In an analysis from 260 published studies, Solomon and McLeod9 showed that only 40% of surgical questions could adequately be answered by RCTs.
Randomized trials, observational studies, and the illusive search for the source of truth
2022, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- *
Supported in part by the Wigston Foundation, Toronto, Ethicon Canada Ltd., Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, and Jenour Foundation, Australia.
Copyright © 1995 Published by Mosby, Inc.