Cohesion in schizophrenic narratives, revisited
References (46)
A linguist looks at “schizophrenic” language
Brain Lang.
(1974)Schizophrenic speech, slips of the tongue, and jargonaphasia: A reply to Fromkin and to Lecours and Vaniers-Clement
Brain Lang.
(1977)A unified explanation for the diverse structural deviations reported for adult schizophrenics with disrupted speech
J. Commun. Disord.
(1982)- et al.
Schizophasia and jargonaphasia: Comparative description with comments on Chaika's and Fromkin's respective looks at “schizophrenic” language
Brain Lang.
(1976) - et al.
Measuring thought disorder with clinical rating scales in schizophrenic and nonschizophrenic patients
Psychiatr. Res.
(1985) - et al.
Positive symptoms and the organization within and between ideas in schizophrenic speech
Psychol. Med.
(1985) - et al.
Antipsychotic effects of lithium in schizophrenia
Am. J. Psychiatr.
(1979) - et al.
The relationship between schizophrenic language, manic language, and aphasia
- (1971)
Accounting for linguistic data in schizophrenia research
Brain Behav. Sci.
(1982)
Thought disorder or speech disorder in schizophrenia?
Schizophrenia Bull.
Normal and psychotic encoding of narrative
Language the Social Mirror
Cohesion in normal and psychotic narrative
The ice cream stories: A study in normal and psychotic narrations
Discourse Processes
The locus of dysfunction in schizophrenic speech
Schizophrenia Bull.
Is schizophrenia a semiotic disorder? Replies to Harrod
Schizophrenia Bull.
Understanding Psychotic Speech: Beyond Freud and Chomsky
A theory of verbal behavior in schizophrenia
Schizophrenic inability to disattend from strong aspects of meaning
J. Abnormal Psychol.
On types of meaningfulness in discourse
Under stress: A functional explanation of English sentence stress
J. Linguist.
Semantic and lexical coherence
College Composition Commun.
Cited by (26)
Understanding the communicative impairments in schizophrenia: A preliminary study
2013, Journal of Communication DisordersCitation Excerpt :Some of these difficulties were included in the definition of Schizophasia, a syndrome which comprises various dysphasia-like impairments, such as clanging, neologism, and unintelligible utterances (Covington et al., 2005; Kraepelin, 1913; Lecours & Vanier-Clèment, 1976). Prosody is also often affected, as is apparent from the flat intonation or unusual voice quality of patients (Stein, 1993; Stassen, 1991; Stassen et al., 1995); there are also semantic issues, such as the use of word approximation and neologism (Chaika & Lambe, 1989; Chaika, 1990; Hoffman, Hogben, Smith, & Calhoun, 1985; Thomas, King, Fraser, & Kendell, 1990). However, the most impaired level in the language of patients with schizophrenia is pragmatics, traditionally defined as the linguistic domain that relates to how language is used to convey meanings in context (see Levinson, 1983).
Usefulness of the BLOC-C and BLOC-SR tests in language assessment
2013, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y AudiologiaSemantic and pragmatic features in persons with schizophrenia
2010, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y AudiologiaA brief method of assessing communication in psychiatric patients
1993, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchSources of Misunderstanding in Interviews With Psychiatric Patients
1992, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice