Cohesion in schizophrenic narratives, revisited

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(89)90034-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Many investigations into schizophrenic speech dysfunction have not taken into account the mechanisms for normal speech production. Moreover, not all investigators have ensured that schizophrenic subjects belong to that group which does show deviant speech structures. We chose speech-disordered subjects who were asked to produce a narrative after viewing a short videostory. This provided a context in which to interpret even deviant narratives and in which to determine cohesive ties. It proved necessary to modify Rochester and Martin's categories of cohesive ties. No significant difference was found in the use of such ties overall. However, when examined category by category a pattern of different usage is evident, showing that schizophrenics suffer from a true dysfunction in narrative production.

References (46)

  • E. Chaika

    Thought disorder or speech disorder in schizophrenia?

    Schizophrenia Bull.

    (1982)
  • E. Chaika

    Normal and psychotic encoding of narrative

  • E. Chaika

    Language the Social Mirror

    (1982)
  • E. Chaika

    Cohesion in normal and psychotic narrative

  • E. Chaika et al.

    The ice cream stories: A study in normal and psychotic narrations

    Discourse Processes

    (1986)
  • E. Chaika et al.

    The locus of dysfunction in schizophrenic speech

    Schizophrenia Bull.

    (1985)
  • E. Chaika et al.

    Is schizophrenia a semiotic disorder? Replies to Harrod

    Schizophrenia Bull.

    (1986)
  • E. Chaika

    Understanding Psychotic Speech: Beyond Freud and Chomsky

    (1990)
  • L. Chapman et al.

    A theory of verbal behavior in schizophrenia

  • L.J. Chapman et al.

    Schizophrenic inability to disattend from strong aspects of meaning

    J. Abnormal Psychol.

    (1976)
  • E.C. Davies

    On types of meaningfulness in discourse

  • N. Erteschik-Shir et al.

    Under stress: A functional explanation of English sentence stress

    J. Linguist.

    (1983)
  • J. Fahnestock

    Semantic and lexical coherence

    College Composition Commun.

    (1983)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Understanding the communicative impairments in schizophrenia: A preliminary study

      2013, Journal of Communication Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some of these difficulties were included in the definition of Schizophasia, a syndrome which comprises various dysphasia-like impairments, such as clanging, neologism, and unintelligible utterances (Covington et al., 2005; Kraepelin, 1913; Lecours & Vanier-Clèment, 1976). Prosody is also often affected, as is apparent from the flat intonation or unusual voice quality of patients (Stein, 1993; Stassen, 1991; Stassen et al., 1995); there are also semantic issues, such as the use of word approximation and neologism (Chaika & Lambe, 1989; Chaika, 1990; Hoffman, Hogben, Smith, & Calhoun, 1985; Thomas, King, Fraser, & Kendell, 1990). However, the most impaired level in the language of patients with schizophrenia is pragmatics, traditionally defined as the linguistic domain that relates to how language is used to convey meanings in context (see Levinson, 1983).

    • Usefulness of the BLOC-C and BLOC-SR tests in language assessment

      2013, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia
    • Semantic and pragmatic features in persons with schizophrenia

      2010, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia
    • Sources of Misunderstanding in Interviews With Psychiatric Patients

      1992, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text