Skip to main content
Log in

Do we need a concept of disease?

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The terms “health”, “disease” and “illness” are frequently used in clinical medicine. This has misled philosophers into believing that these concepts are important for clinical thinking and decision making. For instance, it is held that decisions about whether or not to treat someone or whether to relieve someone of moral responsibility depend on whether the person has a disease. In this paper it is argued that the crucial role of the ‘disease’ concept is illusory. The health/disease distinction is irrelevant for most decisions and represents a conceptual straightjacket. Sophisticated and mature clinical decision making requires that we free ourselves from the concept of disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boorse C. On the distinction between disease and illness.Philosophy and Public Affairs 1975; 5: 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boorse C. What a theory of mental health should be.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1976; 6: 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boorse C. Health as a theoretical concept.Philosophy of Science 1977; 44: 542–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Engelhardt HT Jr. The concepts of health and disease. In: Engelhardt HT Jr, Spicker SF, eds.Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences. Dordrecht: D Reidel, 1975: 125–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. King LS. What is disease?Philosophy of Science 1954: 21: 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Margolis J. The concept of disease.J Med Philos 1976: 1: 238–55.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nordenfelt L.On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach. Dordrecht: D Reidel, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bunzl M. Comment on “Health as a theoretical concept”.Philosophy of Science 1980; 47: 116–18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goosens WK. Values, health and medicine.Philosophy of Science 1980; 47: 100–15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Caplan A. Does the philosophy of medicine exist?Theor Med 1992; 13: 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wartofsky MW. Organs, organisms and disease: human ontology and medical practice. In: Engelhardt HT Jr, Spicker SF, eds.Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences. Dordrecht: D Reidel, 1975: 67–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wulff HR, Andur Pedersen S, Rosenberg R.Philosophy of Medicine: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andreoli TE, Carpenter CCJ, Plum F, Smith LH, eds.Cecil Essentials of Medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dawkins R.The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford university Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dawkins R.The Blind Watchmaker. London: Longman, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hesslow, G. Do we need a concept of disease?. Theoretical Medicine 14, 1–14 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993984

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993984

Key words

Navigation