Skip to main content
Log in

Is There a Tension Between Doctors' Duty of Care and Evidence-Based Medicine?

  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interaction between evidence-based medicineand doctors' duty of care to patients iscomplex. One the one hand, there is surely anobligation to take account of the bestavailable evidence when offering health care topatients. On the other hand, it is equallyimportant to be aware of important shortcomingsin the processes and practices ofevidence-based medicine. There are tensionsbetween the population focus of evidence-basedmedicine and the duties that doctors have toindividual patients. Implementingevidence-based medicine may have unpredictableconsequences upon the overall quality of healthcare. Patients may have a range of reasons forpreferring one form of treatment over another,not all of which are captured by currentformulations of evidence. This paper examinesthese issues, using relevant examples fromevidence-based medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson, D. (1998) Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health. London: Stationery Office.

  • Ashcroft, R., Hope, T. and Parker, M. (2001) Ethical Issues and Evidence-Based Patient Choice. In A. Edwards and G. Elwyn (Eds.), Evidence-Based Patient Choice: Inevitable or Impossible? (pp. 53–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, D. (1999) Community: The Neglected Tradition of Public Health. In D. Beauchamp and B. Steinbock (Eds.), New Ethics for the Public's Health (pp. 57–67). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S., Roland, M. and Buetow, S. (2000) Defining Quality of Care. Social Science and Medicine 51, 1611–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane Collaboration (2001) Cochrane Brochure. Cochrane collaboration website: www.cochrane.org/cochrane/cc-broch.htm

  • Cookson, R., McDaid, D. and Maynard, A. (2001) Wrong SIGN, NICE Mess: Is National Guidance Distorting Allocation of Resources? British Medical Journal 323, 743–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dans, A., Dans, L., Guyatt, G.H. and Richardson, S. (1998) Users' Guide to the Medical Literature: XIV. How to Decide on the Applicability of Clinical Trial Results to Your Patient. Journal of the American Medical Association 279, 545–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson, D. and Vineis, P. (2002) Evidence-Based Medicine and Quality of Care. Health Care Analysis 10, 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, V.A., Sheldon, T.A., Sowden, A. and Watt, I.S. (1998) Evidence-Informed Patient Choice. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14, 212–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., Eccles, M., Grol, R., Griffiths, C. and Grimshaw, J. (1999) Using Clinical Guidelines. British Medical Journal 318, 728–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijling, B.B., Spies, T.H., Lobo, C.M., Hulscher, M.E., van Drenth, B.B., Braspenning, J.C., Prins, A., van der Wouden, J.C. and Grol, R. (2001) Blood Pressure Control in Treated Hypertensive Patients: Clinical Performance of General Practitioners. British Journal of General Practice 51, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, L. (1999) Evidence-Based Medicine and General Practice. In C. Dowrick and L. Frith (Eds.), General Practice and Ethics: Uncertainty and Responsibility (pp. 29–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Medical Council (2001) Duties of a Doctor. GMC website: http://www.gmc-uk.org/ standards/standards_frameset.htm.

  • Guyatt, G.H., Sinclair, J., Cook, D.J. and Glasziou, P. (1999) Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XVI. How to Use a Treatment Recommendation. Journal of the American Medical Association 281, 1836–1843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, T. (1996) Evidence-Based Patient Choice. London: King's Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, J.S. (2000) For Debate: The Virtuous Public Health Physician. Journal of Public Health Medicine 22, 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (1996) Trust as an Affective Attitude. Ethics 107, 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister-Sharp, D., McDonagh, M., Khan, K. and Kleijen, J. (2000) A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of the Taxanes Used in the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer and Ovarian Cancer. University of York, York, UK: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, P., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Gould, C., Gantley, M. and Kinmouth, A. (1997) Open Randomised Trial of Prescribing Strategies in Managing Sore Throat. British Medical Journal 314, 722–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J.M. (1997) Medicine and Public Health, Ethics and Human Rights. Hastings Center Report 27, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnachie, A., Watt, G. and Upton, M. (2001) Clinical Guidelines for Coronary Heart Disease Prevention–a Cause of Increasing Health Inequalities? Association of Univer-sity Departments of General Practice 30th Annual Scientific Meeting Programme and Abstracts (p. 17). Parkinson Court, University of Leeds 11-13 July 2002.

  • Mooney, G. (1998) “Communitarian Claims” as an Ethical Basis for Allocating Health Care Resources. Social Science and Medicine 47, 1171–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2000) Guidance on the Use of Taxanes for Breast Cancer (Technology Appraisal Guidance). London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, N. and Bateman, H. (1999) Applying Research Evidence to Individuals in Primary Care: A Study Using Non-Rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation. Family Practice 16, 414–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Garcia, R. and Akhter, M. (2000) Human Rights: The Foundation of Public Health Practice. American Journal of Public Health 90, 693–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W.A. (2002a) Evidence-Based Medicine in Practice: Limiting or Facilitating Patient Choice? Health Expectations 5, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W.A. (2002b) Are Guidelines Ethical? Some Considerations for General Practice. British Journal of General Practice 52, 663–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, W.W. (1999) Application of Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials to General Practice. Lancet 353, 661–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D.L. (1996) Evidence Based Medicine: What It Is and What It Isn't. British Medical Journal 312, 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (1999a) Lipids and the Primary Prevention of Heart Disease: A National Clinical Guideline.

  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (1999b) Management of Sore Throat and Indica-tions for Tonsillectomy. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weel, C. (1996) Chronic Diseases in General Practice: The Longitudinal Dimensions. European Journal of General Practice 2, 17–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, W.A. Is There a Tension Between Doctors' Duty of Care and Evidence-Based Medicine?. Health Care Analysis 10, 277–287 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022999724081

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022999724081

Navigation