Responses

This article has a correction. Please see:

PDF

Positive affect as coercive strategy: conditionality, activation and the role of psychology in UK government workfare programmes
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Shame on them

    This is an awesome article...thank you for it. I had supposed previously that the practices exposed here would be in contravention of Codes of Practice/Codes of Ethics of psychology and therapy based organisations so it is shocking to find they are explicitly implicated in the humiliating and dehumanising practices described. Surely professional codes state in various forms the obligation 'to do no harm'? (physical or m...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.