Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Medicine and the humanities—theoretical and methodological issues
  1. R Puustinen1,
  2. M Leiman2,
  3. A M Viljanen3
  1. 1University of Tampere Medical School, Tampere, Finland
  2. 2Department of Psychology, University of Joensuu, Finland
  3. 3Academy of Finland, Department of Anthropology, University of Helsinki, Finland
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Raimo Puustinen
 Hedelmäkatu 8 A, 33270 Tampere, Finland; raimo.puustinenpispala.net

Abstract

Engel’s biopsychosocial model, Cassell’s promotion of the concept “person” in medical thinking and Pellegrino’s and Thomasma’s philosophy of medicine are attempts to widen current biomedical theory of disease and to approach medicine as a form of human activity in pursuit of healing. To develop this approach further we would like to propose activity theory as a possible means for understanding the nature of medical practice. By “activity theory” we refer to developments which have evolved from Vygotsky’s research on socially mediated mental functions and processes. Analysing medicine as activity enforces the joint consideration of target and subject: who is doing what to whom. This requires the use of historical, linguistic, anthropological, and semiotic tools. Therefore, if we analyse medicine as an activity, humanities are both theoretically and methodologically “inbound” (or internal) to the analysis itself. On the other hand, literature studies or anthropological writings provide material for analysing the various forms of medical practices.

  • medicine and the humanities
  • activity theory
  • L Vygotsky
  • philosophy of medicine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes