ORIGINAL ARTICLES
The intersubjective and the intrasubjective in the patient–physician dyad: implications for medical humanities education
Correspondence to:
Ayelet Kuper, Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Room A442, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5 Canada; ayelet94{at}post.harvard.edu
At the heart of medicine is the patient, and the fundamental relationship in medicine is the patient–physician dyad. Smiths argument for the intersubjective creation of knowledge, which is itself indebted to Bakhtins notion of the utterance and of the necessity of "the other" in the development of meaning, enables an exploration of the creation of meaning during the patient–physician encounter. The analysis is enriched by Haraways concepts of partial perspectives and of dispersion, which expose the many roles and voices in which the physician and patient may interact. This approach emphasises the use of the medical humanities as a tool to teach medical students about the ambiguities of clinical practice, in which there is often no "right answer" except what is appropriate for the individual patient.
Keywords: physician–patient relations; post ism; humanities; medical education
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
