HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Davies, H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Davies, H

Can Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein be read as an early research ethics text?

Correspondence to:
H Davies
40 Avenell Road, London N5 1DP, UK; hugh.davies{at}corec.org.uk

The current, popular view of the novel Frankenstein is that it describes the horrors consequent upon scientific experimentation; the pursuit of science leading inevitably to tragedy. In reality the importance of the book is far from this. Although the evil and tragedy resulting from one medical experiment are its theme, a critical and fair reading finds a more balanced view that includes science’s potential to improve the human condition and reasons why such an experiment went awry. The author argues that Frankenstein is an early and balanced text on the ethics of research upon human subjects and that it provides insights that are as valid today as when the novel was written. As a narrative it provides a gripping story that merits careful analysis by those involved in medical research and its ethical review, and it is more enjoyable than many current textbooks! To support this thesis, the author will place the book in historical, scientific context, analyse it for lessons relevant to those involved in research ethics today, and then draw conclusions.

Abbreviations: GAfREC, Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees; IRB, institutional review board; REC, research ethics committee

Keywords: Frankenstein; scientific experimentation; research ethics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I Bamforth Can Frankenstein be read as an early research ethics text? Med. Humanit., December 1, 2004; 30(2): 106 - 106. [Full Text] [PDF]