MH

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arnesen, T M
Right arrow Articles by Norheim, O F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arnesen, T M
Right arrow Articles by Norheim, O F
2003;29:81-86
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Quantifying quality of life for economic analysis: time out for time trade off

T M Arnesen1, O F Norheim2

1 Fafo Institute for Applied International Studies, PO Box 2947 Tøyen 0608 Oslo, Norway
2 University of Bergen Ulriksdal 8c 5009 Bergen, Norway

Correspondence to:
Dr Arnesen
Fafo Institute for applied International Studies, PO Box 2947 Tøyen 0608 Oslo, Norway; tma{at}fafo.no, trudivar{at}online.no

The "Time trade-off" (TTO), is the most widely used method to "quality adjust" life years for "QALYs" in cost utility analysis. In this paper we ask if it is theoretically likely that the TTO is valid for this use. The TTO consists in a trade off between longevity and quality of life. Firstly, we argue that it is impossible to control for all factors that may influence one’s willingness to sacrifice lifetime. Secondly, that longevity and quality of life are too closely interrelated for the hypothetical trade off to reveal real preferences. Thirdly, that the TTO handles the value of a life year inconsistently because it simultaneously assumes that it changes (as an outcome measure) and that it doesn’t change (as a currency unit). Lastly, we ask whether the difficulties stem from an inherent contradiction in trying to quantify quality of life. The problems of theoretical validity and internal consistency, contrast the use of the results as exact measurements. We conclude that cost utility analysis based on TTO cannot be trusted as a tool for setting priorities in health.


Keywords: quality of life; utility; cost effectiveness analysis; time trade off; QALY; DALY; priority setting

Abbreviations: DALY, disability adjusted life years; QALY, quality adjusted life years; TTO, time trade off




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med. HumanitiesHome page
L. G Underwood
Now bounded, now immeasurable: perspectives on time in disability, in suffering and at end of life
Med. Humanit., June 1, 2007; 33(1): 11 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
L. J. Damschroder, T. R. Roberts, B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, and P. A. Ubel
Why People Refuse to Make Tradeoffs in Person Tradeoff Elicitations: A Matter of Perspective?
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 266 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
T Smith
Critical relationships in the quality and safety of health care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2004; 13(2): 156 - 159.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.