Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Medical Humanities 2002;28:78-81; doi:10.1136/mh.28.2.78
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
2002;28:78-81
© 2002 Medical Humanities

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Does chaos theory have major implications for philosophy of medicine?

S Holm

Professor Holm is also Professor of Medical Ethics at the Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Norway

Correspondence to:
Professor S Holm, Institute of Medicine, Law and Bioethics, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
soren.holm{at}man.ac.uk

In the literature it is sometimes claimed that chaos theory, non-linear dynamics, and the theory of fractals have major implications for philosophy of medicine, especially for our analysis of the concept of disease and the concept of causation. This paper gives a brief introduction to the concepts underlying chaos theory and non-linear dynamics. It is then shown that chaos theory has only very minimal implications for the analysis of the concept of disease and the concept of causation, mainly because the mathematics of chaotic processes entail that these processes are fully deterministic. The practical unpredictability of chaotic processes, caused by their extreme sensitivity to initial conditions, may raise practical problems in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, but it raises no major theoretical problems. The relation between chaos theory and the problem of free will is discussed, and it is shown that chaos theory may remove the problem of predictability of decisions, but does not solve the problem of free will. Chaos theory may thus be very important for our understanding of physiological processes, and specific disease entities, without having any major implications for philosophy of medicine.

Keywords: chaos theory; philosophy of medicine; non-linear dynamics; concept of disease; concept of causation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Knight, L V (2006). A silly expression: Consultants' implicit and explicit understanding of Medical Humanities. A qualitative analysis. Med. Humanities 32: 119-124 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Evans, H M, Greaves, D A (2003). Looking for emerging themes in medical humanities--some invitations to our readers. Med. Humanities 29: 1-3 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.